Robopocalypse: A Novel
Daniel H. Wilson
The possible- and, some say,
inevitable, sentience of artificial intelligence certainly isn't the most
original way for an author to begin an apocalyptic tale, yet each robot story
seems to tell us something about ourselves and, perhaps, what makes life
unique. One would expect Daniel H. Wilson, who has a Ph.D. in robotics, to have
a particularly interesting perspective on the idea of a robot uprising. Though Robopocalypse does entertain some
interesting notions about the technical possibilities of robotics, however, all
that it really delivers is a thin skeleton, without any satisfying thematic or
character-based elements to elevate the book beyond a mere piquing of the
scientific interest. Wilson
first errs in the book's form, a kind of segmented post-facto history assembled
by (naturally) one of the main human players in the drama. Nothing is
inherently wrong with this set-up, and it worked wonderfully in World War Z, but from the beginning it
feels clumsy and forced, a bit too self-conscious on both the main narrator and
author's parts. We begin not with a feeling of suspense or impending doom, but
with the reassurance that everything turns out all right, thus robbing the main
narrative of much of its power. Aware that everything turns out all right,
readers are less inclined to truly invest in the psychological uncertainties
that a proper apocalypse thrives upon. To make matters worse, each section is
introduced and concluded with a note from our historian, and while they largely
succeed to place events within their respective context, they are painfully
reductive and, particularly pre-"Zero Hour", childishly leading. Wilson keeps earnestly
promising that certain characters will be vital in the New War and talking up
his own story selection, and while this may be something that an experienced
soldier might say when retelling his recent history, it is unsatisfying in the
hands of an author who should know better. Again, Wilson fails to build any
kind of suspense or dramatic resonance, instead constantly reminding readers
that he, the author, is in charge of the story at hand, and that he has
oh-so-cleverly created (wait for it!) an intertwined, global-scale plot.
Even more disastrous than these
cutesy asides are the individual narrative voices. While I can appreciate the
attempt at soldierly lingo or a Southern drawl in each first-person chapter, the
numerous voices are surprisingly, er, robotic. And for some unfathomable,
bizarre reason, the stories are told in present tense. Each and every one.
Whether a police interview about a recent crime or a robot's log, the authors
are present and accounted for, even when recounting past events. The effect is
horrific, especially when paired with a misguided insistence on first person
narration for a book whose entire conceit is that its constituent stories are
appearing to the framing narrator via a computer. While it's true that people
may recount stories using a mixture of tenses ("So, I'm sitting there when
x finally shows up"), the existence of the framing narrative as well as
the constant asides continually remind readers that the events of the book are
occurring in the past. Wherefore, then, the false urgency? All suspense has
already been drained from the book anyway, with the continual assurances that
this character is important and that event turned out correctly and the author
knows what he's doing, okay. It's absolutely maddening, and makes what should
be either a breezy or deeply philosophical novel an absolute slog at times.
Instead of character development and world building, we get transparent,
ineffective gimmicks.
That the book is written so
poorly is a shame, because it is evident throughout that Wilson has, in fact,
put a lot of thought into his particular robot apocalypse, and he is able to
effortlessly drop readers straight into that world when he stops trying so hard
to sell his story. He utilizes a good mixture of familiar technology,
foreseeable developments, and slight exaggerations to create a near future that
is utterly believable, one that would, in the hands of a more competent writer,
force us to re-think our current
relationship with technology. Instead, what we get is a lot of intriguing
technological developments wrapped up in an insufficient narrative full of
cardboard characters. Worse yet, there is no discernible theme. Why, exactly,
does the robotic arch-nemesis decide to destroy humanity? There are some hints
as to his motives, but I fear that Wilson
mistakes a lack of sufficient development for something akin to subtlety. While
the slap-bang aspects of the narrative are good enough to keep readers engaged
despite a host of flaws, the book's ultimate conclusions, or lack thereof, are
ultimately disappointing, and a work that should have excelled is instead
relegated to the back corners of the brain. Those things Wilson does best- create compelling
near-future technology, weave an interconnected plot- are crowded out by the
book's basic writing flaws, wherein the compelling becomes sadly mundane. Robopocalypse posits an interesting
future in an uninteresting way, and is a bit too caught up in its potential
strengths to actually draw upon them; it is a novel of ideas but not, sadly, of
engagement with them.
Grade: C+