Three and Out: Rich Rodriguez and the Michigan Wolverines in the Crucible of
College Football
John U. Bacon
It's unclear why Michigan fans
would really want to re-live the three years now referred to as the
"Rich-Rod Era," when the perennial power's fortress came crashing
down in a melodrama played out across national news outlets and computer
screens. It is undeniable, however, that it is a compelling, if painful, story,
and the depth of Bacon's unprecedented access certainly presents a unique
opportunity to peer inside a major college football program. Bacon's respect
and fondness for the program are evident, but they don't infringe on his
ability to present his account with an attitude of fairness. His biases do emerge
from time to time, but the book maintains an air of journalistic thoroughness.
It is clear that Bacon attempted to seek accounts from all of the main players,
and the book usually hesitates to draw firm conclusions without a significant
amount of fact-checking and first-hand accounts. Unfortunately, however, for
all that, the book often reads as a straightforward recapitulation of events
that I, for one, remember quite clearly and would rather forget. What promises
to be a far-reaching expose (of sorts) of big-time collegiate locker rooms becomes,
instead, a list of plays, scores, and games, with the most damning inferences
restricted to a preparatory chapter on the end of Lloyd Carr's tenure rather.
Instead of a hard-hitting attempt to expose why Rich Rodriguez failed at Michigan (for it cannot
be argued that he did), Bacon presents the same myriad of possibilities that
have already been considered and argued about ad nauseum throughout the fanbase. Though Bacon clearly has the
insight, information, and ability to weave a compelling account of the stakes
of college football and the game's impact on modern academia, his account is
merely a day-to-day type story we all know far too well, with items of interest
scattered and fairly infrequent. While Bacon's inside view of major sports is
appreciated, sincere, and well-written, it reads more as background than as an
investigation, which is, after all, perhaps its primary purpose. It is hard,
however, to read Three and Out
without sensing a missed opportunity, and it's hard to know whether to credit
the author for sticking fairly strictly to what he witnessed or to fault him
for a lack of attempt to cast a wider net.
Grade: B+
No comments:
Post a Comment