We Are Not Ourselves
Matthew
Thomas
This
novel has received a number of positive reviews from the usual
outlets, and I was intrigued by the possibility of a sweeping, but
intimate, look at a family's experiences throughout the mid- to
late-20th century. While that is exactly what We
Are Not Ourselves
does provide, I couldn't help but feel that the book was just there,
successful with regard to its apparent ambitions but ultimately
forgettable in its ordinariness. A lack of outright flaws, paired
with this general sense of mere existence, makes it somewhat
difficult to dissect the book and determine what makes it tick. The
story, which follows the life of second-generation Irish-American
Eileen Leary (née Tumulty) in New York City and its environs, is
relatively straightforward, as is its cast of characters. Thomas
touches lightly on worn stereotypes- the older generation is full of
drunken, but hardworking and reliable Irishmen and -women- but does
so in a way that feels surprisingly honest. Indeed, the novel's utter
emotional honesty, and the forthright way in which it comes to the
fore, is its greatest strength, and likely the cause of its undoing.
We Are Not
Ourselves
so aptly reflects a certain kind of American experience that it no
longer stands out as art, becoming relegated instead to the dull
memory of lived experience. This reflects no small amount of skill on
Thomas's part, but it does make for a reading experience that
ultimately feels unnecessary; with nothing particularly compelling or
unusual about these characters or their situation, it becomes
difficult to justify spending 600-plus pages with them.
Then
again, those aspects of the novel that stand out are quite
remarkable. What does set the Learys apart, to an extent, is the
uncomfortable and inescapable presence of Alzheimer's for much of the
book. Like in real life, it begins as the reader's sneaky suspicion
before being reluctantly named and then quickly blossoming into an
all-consuming beast that overshadows everything else. Its effect on
Ed (Eileen's husband, the afflicted), on Eileen's upwardly mobile
ambitions and marriage, and on their son Connell is immediate,
lasting, and as devastating as you'd expect. I found myself
increasingly sympathetic to Eileen's and Connell's plight(s), even
though I often had little patience for either or both at any given
moment. To experience the gradual, and suddenly rapid, decline of
Edmund Leary is, I suspect, to replicate in a small but accurate way
the actual lived experience of those who have suffered the same
knock-on effects of this and other diseases.
There
can be no doubt, then, that Matthew Thomas is a skilled writer, and
that he possesses a keen eye for the types of detail that render this
novel so unmistakably believable. Unfortunately, what he has produced
is a book that somehow lacks focus despite its narrow, well-defined
scope. The first few perspective changes from Eileen to Connell are
unexpected, and Thomas does not wholly capitalize on the different
aspects of the story that each can provide; too often, such a jump is
immediately forgotten, the narrative moving forward where a bit of
reflection may have enhanced the story in a way that pure plot never
could. Likewise, the plot lurches forward in unexpected bursts, and
the reader is never quite sure when, in calendar time, the events are
occurring. The book makes it unnecessarily difficult for readers to
gain their chronologically minded bearings, which is distracting and
detracts from the overall reading experience; we cannot begin to
sense changes in the characters' lives if we cannot understand the
ever-shifting context in which they occur.
Likewise,
though Thomas brings his readers convincingly into his viewpoint
characters' minds, he still fails to make them unique. Eileen and Connell may be well-defined, but- much like
the supporting cast- they are defined in ways that border
precariously on stereotypes; Thomas is rescued time and again by his
attention to the tiny details that make the Learys incrementally more
interesting than typical stock characters. Stereotyped or not,
however, they are drawn so accurately from real life that they often
become tiresome. In this way, they reflect the book's greatest
strength and its ultimate weakness. The book is too convincing, and
too real, to provide a particularly compelling reading experience; at
the end of the day, it's just another series of days in the life. The
book, for me, lacks any one exceptional characteristic that would
make it stand out. We Are Not Ourselves
is, as it intends to be, a sweeping, generalized, and believable look
at the experiences of an upwardly mobile middle-class family in the
20th-century United States, but even the looming presence and
lingering effects of Alzheimer's- brilliantly rendered here, make no
mistake- aren't enough to make the book particularly compelling or
memorable.
Grade:
B
No comments:
Post a Comment